Leveraging Protein Dynamics to Identify Functional Phosphorylation Sites using Deep Learning Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate prediction of post-translational modifications (PTMs) is of great significance in understanding cellular processes, by modulating protein structure and dynamics. Nowadays, with the rapid growth of protein data at different "omics" levels, machine learning models largely enriched the prediction of PTMs. However, most machine learning models only rely on protein sequence and little structural information. The lack of the systematic dynamics analysis underlying PTMs largely limits the PTM functional predictions. In this research, we present two dynamics-centric deep learning models, namely, cDL-PAU and cDL-FuncPhos, by incorporating sequence, structure, and dynamics-based features to elucidate the molecular basis and underlying functional landscape of PTMs. cDL-PAU achieved satisfactory area under the curve (AUC) scores of 0.804-0.888 for predicting phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination (PAU) sites, while cDL-FuncPhos achieved an AUC value of 0.771 for predicting functional phosphorylation (FuncPhos) sites, displaying reliable improvements. Through a feature selection, the dynamics-based coupling and commute ability show large contributions in discovering PAU sites and FuncPhos sites, suggesting the allosteric propensity for important PTMs. The application of cDL-FuncPhos in three oncoproteins not only corroborates its strong performance in FuncPhos prioritization but also gains insight into the physical basis for the functions. The source code and data set of cDL-PAU and cDL-FuncPhos are available at https://github.com/ComputeSuda/PTM_ML.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".