MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285008875 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15124

Decentralized Cache-aided Offloading in Edge Cloud Collaborative Environment using Deep Q Reinforcement Learning

2022· dissertation· en· W4285008875 on OpenAlexaff
Vishnu Guddeti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningCloud computingDistributed computingComputation offloadingCacheEnergy consumptionLatency (audio)BenchmarkingEdge computingEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionCloudletContainer (type theory)Computer networkArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many emerging applications such as augmented reality, facial recognition, autonomous cars, and e-health require heavy computation, and the processed results have to be available to the user in the order of milliseconds.Edge computing combined with cloud computing can address this challenge by distributing the load (offloading) on different connected computing resources.However, effective task offloading requires an efficient resource management framework.Many existing offloading methodologies consider only latency and energy consumption in a pre-defined network configuration implemented on a small scale.In addition, the effect of the location of the offloading algorithm has not been extensively studied.This thesis introduces a novel adaptive offloading framework using Online Deep Q reinforcement learning.The proposed framework considers strict latency constraints, high state space, rapidly changing user mobility, heterogeneous resources, and stochastic task arrival rate.The proposed research also highlights the importance of caching and introduces a novel concept called "container caching" that caches the dependencies of popular applications.Therefore, offloading decisions are taken to minimize energy consumption, latency, and caching costs.Moreover, the significance of deployment location of the offloading algorithm is also reviewed, and a distributed offloading method is proposed.Extensive simulations in a discrete event simulator implemented in Java using realistic profiles of tasks have been conducted.Simulation results and comparisons with existing benchmarking algorithms showed remarkable performance in terms of energy consumption, network traffic, task failures, remaining power on a large scale demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207