MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285010225 · doi:10.1364/ao.461052

Wind imaging using simultaneous fringe sampling with field-widened Michelson interferometers

2022· article· en· W4285010225 on OpenAlexafffund
Samuel Kristoffersen, W. E. Ward, Jeffery Langille, William A. Gault, Aaron Power, Ian Miller, Alan Scott, Dennis L. Arsenault, Marine Favier, Valérie Losier, Shaojun Lu, Rui Zhang, Chunmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)LightMachinery (Canada)University of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationCanadian Space AgencyUniversity of New Brunswick
KeywordsAstronomical interferometerAirglowOpticsMichelson interferometerInterferometryRemote sensingField of viewSampling (signal processing)AliasingLidarPhysicsComputer scienceComputer visionGeologyDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207