Effects of clay and fireclay addition on the properties of magnesia–forsterite–spinel refractories synthesized at different firing temperatures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of adding clay and fireclay on the physical and mechanical properties of magnesia-based refractories such as contraction, bending strength, bulk density, and apparent porosity. Domestic raw materials were used for the preparation of samples fired at 1350, 1450, and 1550 °C for 2 h. Adding clay exhibited no significant effect on the density and porosity, whereas adding fireclay had a remarkable influence on the shrinkage. Nevertheless, the effects of clay and fireclay on the strength of magnesia were unnoticeable. X-ray diffraction results showed that, after firing, the main phase compositions of the samples with clay addition were periclase and forsterite. Adding fireclay led to the synthesis of magnesite spinel, which can be attributed to the high alumina content. Based on scanning electron microscopy, no liquid phase was formed indicating that the sintering was a solid-state evolution with the synthesis of forsterite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it