The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Mościcka P, Cwajda-Białasik J, Jawień A, Szewczyk M. The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers. Leczenie Ran. 2022;19(2):55-60. doi:10.5114/lr.2022.115797. APA Mościcka, P., Cwajda-Białasik, J., Jawień, A., & Szewczyk, M. (2022). The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers. Leczenie Ran, 19(2), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.5114/lr.2022.115797 Chicago Mościcka, Paulina, Justyna Cwajda-Białasik, Arkadiusz Jawień, and Maria T. Szewczyk. 2022. "The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers". Leczenie Ran 19 (2): 55-60. doi:10.5114/lr.2022.115797. Harvard Mościcka, P., Cwajda-Białasik, J., Jawień, A., and Szewczyk, M. (2022). The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers. Leczenie Ran, 19(2), pp.55-60. https://doi.org/10.5114/lr.2022.115797 MLA Mościcka, Paulina et al. "The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers." Leczenie Ran, vol. 19, no. 2, 2022, pp. 55-60. doi:10.5114/lr.2022.115797. Vancouver Mościcka P, Cwajda-Białasik J, Jawień A, Szewczyk M. The role of oral supplementation in the healing process of venous ulcers. Leczenie Ran. 2022;19(2):55-60. doi:10.5114/lr.2022.115797.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it