Radiomics Diagnostic Tool Based on Deep Learning for Colposcopy Image Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Colposcopy imaging is widely used to diagnose, treat and follow-up on premalignant and malignant lesions in the vulva, vagina, and cervix. Thus, deep learning algorithms are being used widely in cervical cancer diagnosis tools. In this study, we developed and preliminarily validated a model based on the Unet network plus SVM to classify cervical lesions on colposcopy images. Methodology: Two sets of images were used: the Intel & Mobile ODT Cervical Cancer Screening public dataset, and a private dataset from a public hospital in Ecuador during a routine colposcopy, after the application of acetic acid and lugol. For the latter, the corresponding clinical information was collected, specifically cytology on the PAP smear and the screening of human papillomavirus testing, prior to colposcopy. The lesions of the cervix or regions of interest were segmented and classified by the Unet and the SVM model, respectively. Results: The CAD system was evaluated for the ability to predict the risk of cervical cancer. The lesion segmentation metric results indicate a DICE of 50%, a precision of 65%, and an accuracy of 80%. The classification results’ sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 70%, 48.8%, and 58%, respectively. Randomly, 20 images were selected and sent to 13 expert colposcopists for a statistical comparison between visual evaluation experts and the CAD tool (p-value of 0.597). Conclusion: The CAD system needs to improve but could be acceptable in an environment where women have limited access to clinicians for the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of cervical cancer; better performance is possible through the exploration of other deep learning methods with larger datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".