Sleep Deprivation & Amphetamine Induced Psychosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the relationship between sleep deprivation and amphetamine-induced psychosis. Methods: The patient group included 78 patients with a diagnosis of amphetamine (Captagon)-induced psychosis. The control group included 49 patients with no current or past history of amphetamine (Captagon)-induced psychosis. All study subjects underwent the following: a demographic sheet, a structured clinical interview for SM-IV (SCID 1), a drug use questionnaire, a questionnaire to explore any relationship between sleep deprivation and Captagon-induced psychosis, routine medical investigation, and urine screening for detection of drugs. Results: The patient group showed significantly higher both regular and maximum daily doses of Captagon. Patients showed more periods of sleep deprivation with the use of Captagon in comparison to controls, especially with the increase of the Captagon dose. Patients believed that the occurrence and termination of sleep deprivation were the cause of the start and end of psychotic experiences (more so than the increase and decrease or stoppage of Captagon doses). Conclusion: sleep deprivation plays an essential role in the development of psychotic symptoms in patients who are using Captagon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".