Novel Recovery Algorithms for Block Sparse Signals With Known and Unknown Borders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents two novel Bayesian learning recovery algorithms for block sparse signals corresponding to two distinct cases. In the first case, the signals within each block are correlated and the block borders are known, whereas in the second case, the block borders are unknown and the signal elements are uncorrelated. For the first case, the proposed recovery algorithm differs from existing ones in two aspects. First, in each iteration, the optimal block covariances are obtained based on the data estimated in previous iterations. Hence, it does not rely on prior assumptions nor does it restrict the covariance matrices to have a particular structure. Second, the decision to declare a block as zero or non-zero is based on hypothesis testing, which ensures that the probability of erroneous detection is minimized. For the second case, we introduce a new prior model which is characterized by elastic dependencies among neighbouring signal elements. Using this model, we develop a novel Bayesian learning algorithm which iterates between estimating the dependencies among the signal elements and updating the Gaussian prior model. Numerical simulations illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".