MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285029384 · doi:10.1109/jmmct.2022.3189229

An Effective Global Approach for Assessment of Decoupling Capacitors on Mixed Planar and Transmission Line PDNs

2022· article· en· W4285029384 on OpenAlexaff
Ihsan Erdin, Ramachandra Achar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE journal on multiscale and multiphysics computational techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoupling capacitorCapacitorPower integrityTransmission linePlanarDecoupling (probability)Electrical impedanceElectric power transmissionElectronic engineeringComputationPower (physics)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltagePrinted circuit boardPhysicsAlgorithmSignal integrity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A global analysis technique is proposed to calculate the effectiveness of decoupling capacitors on practical power delivery networks (PDN). The proposed method is based on separation of a PDN into its power transmission lines (PTL) and non-PTL sections. The PTL section consists of circuit components with the highest impact on the impedance of the specified power pin, including the pin itself, the nearest capacitor and segments of PTL on both sides of the capacitor. The rest of the PDN makes up the non-PTL section which could be composed of planar shapes, PTLs or a mixture of both. The non-PTL section is characterized as a distributed circuit, preferably using an electromagnetic (EM) simulator. The effectiveness of the capacitor is measured by the self-impedance of the pin which depends on the distance between them. The pin impedance is cast in a transcendental equation in the PTL section including the impedance of the non-PTL section. The optimal placement of the capacitor is calculated using an iterative approach. With the proposed method, the use of an EM simulation at each step of the iteration is eliminated, significantly speeding up the computation process. The proposed method is validated on real-life design cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE journal on multiscale and multiphysics computational techniquesSame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207