MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285030001 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15039

Re: Flin Flon Mine: Reaccessing a Site of Extraction

2022· dissertation· en· W4285030001 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anna Romanowska

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsContext (archaeology)Mining engineeringEngineeringWork (physics)Environmental resource managementEnvironmental planningGeographyArchaeologyEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis offers a design intervention for a copper-zinc mine in Flin Flon, Manitoba, considering a response to a landscape that is the marker of more than a century of resource extraction. Through interdisciplinary designresearch tied to the context of the Anthropocene, the work explores the state of three mines in various stages of remediation, including their vast network of tailings ponds, open pits, underground shafts, and industrial structures. The research is based on site immersion, local outreach, historical document analysis, mapping and model making. Theoretically, Figure 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207