MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early Theorists in Russia and the Canadian Backwoods

2021· book-chapter· en· W4285030196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric Helleiner

Bibliographic record

VenueCornell University Press eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyIndustrialisationSovereigntyPolitical scienceTariffIndependence (probability theory)Power (physics)Circulation (fluid dynamics)Political economyEconomyPeriod (music)Economic historySociologyLawEconomicsEngineeringPoliticsAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter expounds on the ideologies of Nikolai Semenovich Mordvinov in Russia and John Rae in Canada. According to Mordvinov, the industrialization of Russia needed to be prioritized in order to boost the country's power and wealth. He also argues how the development of domestic manufacturing was key for the protection of Russia's sovereignty. On the other hand, Rae noted the significance of local industry, tariff protection, invention and technological change for national independence and security. The chapter highlights the complexity of the international circulation of neomercantilist thought in the pre-1939 period. It also compares the ideologies against Friedrich List's.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornell University Press eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207