MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285032518 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15028

Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring Based User-Centric Demand Response for Smart Home Energy Management

2022· dissertation· en· W4285032518 on OpenAlexaff
Nahal Iliaee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemand responseIncentiveDemand sideEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)Home automationSmart gridEnergy managementLoad managementEnergy (signal processing)Environmental economicsPower demandElectricityPower (physics)Computer sciencePower consumptionEngineeringTelecommunicationsEconomicsMicroeconomicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Demand Side Management (DSM) proposes a novel paradigm that generates energy savings on the demand side and views energy usage optimization as an alternative supply source. DR is a type of DSM that refers to market participation behavior in which consumers take the initiative to change their initial energy consumption habits in response to market pricing signals/incentives. However, most research works show that the consumers' satisfaction has not been focused on by researchers. In this thesis, the NILM based User-Centric DSR is proposed. The suggested NILM technique based on edge detection is utilized for the automatic determination of physical characteristics of power-intensive home appliances from users' life patterns. Then, ENN is applied in this study to predict the next day switching events status as well as total power consumption for the next day. Moreover, Q- learning is used to minimize the energy consumption cost while considering users' comfort satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207