MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285034241 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15122

Dynamic and Parallel Resource Allocation with Analytical Performance Estimation for Virtualized Environment

2022· dissertation· en· W4285034241 on OpenAlexaff
Lu Qiao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCrossoverDistributed computingResource allocationVirtual machineGenetic algorithmProcess (computing)Mathematical optimizationGraphTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer networkMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we propose an integrated approach for estimating the performance of virtual network resource allocation and a Genetic Algorithm (GA) based mechanism for online dynamic resource allocation in virtualized environment.The integrated approach is empowered by a novel loss network model with Dynamic Routing And Random Topology (DRART), which is combined with some existing models to create a synergy across different levels through an effective recursive process.Numerical results show the proposed integrated approach can provide accurate predictions on the performances of general virtual network embedding algorithms.We propose a virtual link mapping solution, i.e., Segment Based Genetic Algorithm (SBGA), which provides new definitions for genes and chromosomes in the Genetic Algorithm.Our SBGA approach enables parallel processing for searching optimal allocations.Our theoretical analysis shows that the execution time of our approach can be reduced to logarithmic time.To map virtual nodes and links to physical ones in one stage, we further develop an approach, named as GAOne.Our proposed GAOne approach applies the two-color graph coloring in graph theory to guide the crossover process in the Genetic Algorithm (GA) for valid solutions.Our simulation results show that the proposed GAOne approach is fast and efficient for online resource allocation applications in virtualized environment.i At this point, my Ph.D. journey is coming to the end.In the past six years, I've thought of giving up many times.Fortunately, I decided to persevere.First and foremost, I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my supervisor Dr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207