Modeling and analysis of reluctance motion system with asymmetrical air gaps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve high throughput and efficiency, semiconductor photolithography machines need an actuation system that can meet high acceleration and precision demands on the nanoscale. One available solution is the reluctance actuator, which provides higher acceleration and force output than the standard Lorentz actuator. A floating stage with air-bearings is used to eliminate friction in the photolithography process; however, vibration transfer is not entirely eliminated, leading to potential misalignment and asymmetries between the actuator elements. With asymmetrical offsets between mover elements, the output force can be greatly affected. This paper shows a method for estimating the force of various asymmetrical cases for the C-core reluctance actuator. Analytical models are developed and further improved through polynomial curve fitting using precomputed finite element simulation results from Comsol Multiphysics (COMSOL) to achieve more optimal solutions. An experiment verified the results of the force estimation equations, which were within ∼11% for different cases of asymmetric air gaps. This contribution will lead to a design for a control system that will overcome the issue of asymmetries or other altered states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".