MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285043275 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15013

Gas- and Particulate-Phase Emissions from Lab-Scale Flares Experiencing Liquid Carryover

2022· dissertation· en· W4285043275 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cameron S. Roth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesRadiative forcingEnvironmental scienceCombustionPollutantEnvironmental chemistryAbsorption (acoustics)Environmental engineeringWaste managementAerosolChemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At upstream oil and gas production sites, separators frequently allow saline produced water aerosols to be entrained into flares, a phenomenon known as liquid carryover.This study assesses the impacts on gas-and solid-phase emissions from adding saline solutions to a lab-scale flare.Atomized aqueous solutions containing NaCl, KCl, or NaOH were added to a vertical turbulent diffusion flame burning a hydrocarbon gas mixture representative of flares in Alberta, Canada.The combustion products were analyzed to quantify emission rates of major pollutants and optical properties of the particulate.Over the range of test conditions yields of gas-phase pollutants increased by as much as fortyfold with added NaCl, while black carbon emissions increased by up to three times.Emitted particulate had a greater absorption capacity contributing to an increase in expected radiative forcing effects in the climate.Empirical guidelines for liquid separation requirements to avoid severe increases in emissions were developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil, Gas, and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207