MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285043602 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-15061

Development, Implementation, and Industry Reception of a Novel Multi-source, Data-driven Building Energy Management Toolkit

2022· dissertation· en· W4285043602 on OpenAlexafffund
Andre Markus

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFacility managementEfficient energy useData scienceEnergy (signal processing)AnalyticsEnergy managementBuilding managementBest practiceData managementProcess managementKnowledge managementEngineering managementSystems engineeringEngineeringDatabaseBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Building energy performance is often negatively impacted by inefficient and uninformed operations, leading to wide disparities between predicted and actual energy use in commercial and institutional buildings.Though ample research in data-driven building operations and maintenance analytics has derived various methodologies for extracting energy-saving insights that can supplement operating practice, these approaches have traditionally remained disparate, limiting their application, and are exclusively prevalent in academia.Furthermore, operations personnel who regularly manage controls and maintenance of HVAC equipment can benefit from these novel approaches in augmenting their duties and optimizing building energy efficiency.This research explores the development of a novel multi-source, data-driven building energy management toolkit as a synthesis of established data-driven approaches in the literature comprising inverse energy modelling, anomaly detection and diagnostics, load disaggregation, and occupancy and occupant complaint analytics methods.The toolkit inputs various data types to detect hard and soft faults, optimize sequences of operation settings, and monitor energy flows, occupancy patterns, and occupant satisfaction.The toolkit's unique multi-source analytical approach was used to pinpoint operational deficiencies stemming from inappropriate zone temperature overheating thresholds and perimeter heating devices.Energy-saving insights were generated using data from four separate case study buildings to demonstrate the utility of the toolkit's web-based application platform.Finally, interviews with building operators and facility managers to their interpretations of insights from data-driven approaches were conducted; possible barriers were identified which inhibited industry professionals from effectively deriving and utilizing insights from the visualizations and KPIs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→