Localizing Retinal Blood Vessels In Fundus Images using Fuzzy Logic Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The condition of the vascular system is crucial in the diagnosis of vision abnormalities. The essential element of computerized retinal analysis is vasculature segmentation in digital fundus images. This work introduces an automatic algorithm based on fuzzy logic to detect the retinal blood vessels. The methodology uses the green channel of images and employs pre-processing techniques. The features are extracted using the Robinson compass mask. The Mamdani interval type-2 fuzzy rules are applied to these features to detect the blood vessels, and the result is binarized, followed by post-processing refinements to maximize the performance. The methodology is evaluated using the publicly available DRIVE (Digital Retinal Images for Vessel Extraction) database, and the results are compared with distinguished published methods. Achieving the average accuracy of 94.89%, the sensitivity of 74.78% and specificity of 96.85% show promising results for pre-screening treatments while the technique could be extended to other image segmentation applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".