Multimodal Estimation of Endpoint Force During Quasi-Dynamic and Dynamic Muscle Contractions Using Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate force/torque estimation is essential for applications such as powered exoskeletons, robotics, and rehabilitation. However, force/torque estimation under dynamic conditions is a challenging due to changing joint angles, force levels, muscle lengths, and movement speeds. We propose a novel method to accurately model the generated force under isotonic, isokinetic (quasi-dynamic), and fully dynamic conditions. Our solution uses a deep multimodal CNN to learn from multimodal EMG-IMU data and estimate the generated force for elbow flexion and extension, for both intra- and inter-subject schemes. The proposed deep multimodal CNN extracts representations from EMG (in time and frequency domains) and IMU (in time domain) and aggregates them to obtain an effective embedding for force estimation. We describe a new dataset containing EMG, IMU, and output force data, collected under a number of different experimental conditions, and use this dataset to evaluate our proposed method. The results show the robustness of our approach in comparison to other baseline methods as well as those in the literature, in different experimental setups and validation schemes. The obtained <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values are 0.91±0.034, 0.87±0.041, and 0.81±0.037 for the intra-subject and 0.81±0.048, 0.64±0.037, and 0.59±0.042 for the inter-subject scheme, during isotonic, isokinetic, and dynamic contractions, respectively. Additionally, our results indicate that force estimation improves significantly when the kinematic information (IMU data) is included. Average improvements of 13.95%, 118.18%, and 50.0% (intra-subject) and 28.98%, 41.18%, and 137.93% (inter-subject) for isotonic, isokinetic, and dynamic contractions respectively are achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".