Toward Scalable Risk Analysis for Stochastic Systems Using Extreme Value Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aim to analyze the behaviour of a finite-time stochastic system, whose model is not available, in the context of more rare and harmful outcomes. Standard estimators are not effective in making predictions about such outcomes due to their rarity. Instead, we use Extreme Value Theory (EVT), the theory of the long-term behaviour of normalized maxima of random variables. We quantify risk using the upper-semideviation P(Y)≔(max{Y-μ,0}) of an integrable random variable Y with mean μ≔E(Y). P(Y) is the risk-aware part of the common mean-upper-semideviation functional φλ(Y)≔μ+λρ(Y) with λ0,1. To assess more rare and harmful outcomes, we propose an EVT-based estimator for ρ(Y) in a given fraction of the worst cases. We show that our estimator enjoys a closed-form representation in terms of the popular conditional value-at-risk functional. In experiments, we illustrate the extrapolation power of our estimator using a small number of i.i.d. samples (<50). Our approach is useful for estimating the risk of finite-time systems when models are inaccessible and data collection is expensive. The numerical complexity does not grow with the size of the state space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".