MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285076116 · doi:10.1257/rct.3147

Welfare effects of a non-contributory old age pension: experimental evidence for Ekiti State in Nigeria

2019· dataset· en· W4285076116 on OpenAlexafffund
Damilola Olajide, María Laura Alzúa, Maria Natalia Cantet

Bibliographic record

VenueAEA Randomized Controlled Trials · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersDepartment for International DevelopmentInternational Development Research CentreGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPensionWelfareWelfare stateDemographic economicsState (computer science)EconomicsPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawFinanceMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many countries in the developing world have implemented non-contributory old-age pensions.Evidence of the impact of such policies on the elderly in Sub-Saharan Africa is scarce, however.In this paper, we provide the first evidence from a randomized evaluation of an unconditional, non-contributory pension scheme targeted at the elderly in Ekiti State, Nigeria.Our findings show that treated beneficiaries self-reported better quality of life, more stable mental health, and better general health.We also provide evidence of spillover effects on labor outcomes and on household expenditure patterns as well as support for demandside interventions aimed at improving the welfare of elderly poor citizens and other household members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAEA Randomized Controlled TrialsSame topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207