Concurrent Validity of Zeno Instrumented Walkway and Video-Based Gait Features in Adults With Parkinson’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) presents with motor symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor that can affect gait. To monitor changes associated with disease progression or medication use, quantitative gait assessment is often performed during clinical visits. Conversely, vision-based solutions have been proposed for monitoring gait quality in non-clinical settings. METHODS: We use three 2D human pose-estimation libraries (AlphaPose, Detectron, OpenPose) and one 3D library (ROMP) to calculate gait features from color video, and correlate them with those extracted by a Zeno instrumented walkway in older adults with PD. We calculate video-based gait features using a manual and automated heel-strike detection algorithm, and compare the correlations when the participants walk towards and away from the camera separately. RESULTS: Based on analysis of 67 bidirectional walking bouts from 25 adults with PD, moderate to strong positive correlations were identified between the number of steps, cadence, as well as the mean and coefficient of variation of step width calculated from Zeno and video using 2D pose-estimation libraries. We noted that our automated heel-strike annotation method struggled to identify short steps. CONCLUSION: Gait features calculated from 2D joint trajectories are more strongly correlated with the Zeno than analogous gait features calculated from ROMP. Based on our analysis, videos processed with 2D pose-estimation libraries can be used for longitudinal gait monitoring in individuals with PD. Future work will seek to improve the prediction of gait features using a comprehensive machine learning model to predict gait features directly from color video without relying on intermediate extraction of joint trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".