ANONYMOUS SHORT-STORIES ABOUT PARASHA SIBIRYACHKA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Введение. Нашумевшая в 1805 г. история Параши Луполовой (в источниках встречаются варианты написания Луполова, Лупалова, Лупулова, Лопулова. Автор статьи использует написание Луполова как наиболее частотное), дочери ссыльного, которая пешком дошла из Сибири в Петербург и испросила у Александра I милости для своего осужденного отца, послужила основой целого ряда литературных произведений. В первой половине XIX в. сложился устойчивый «парашин сюжет», который стал настолько популярен, что воспроизводился не только в авторских, но и в анонимных произведениях беллетристики последней четверти XIX в. В истории развития «парашиного сюжета» можно выделить, по крайней мере, два периода: становление (первая половина XIX в.) и модификация (конец XIX – начало XX в.).Цель – ввести в научный оборот обнаруженные анонимные повести на «парашин сюжет», выявить взаимосвязь этих текстов, проследить изменение в них сюжетного кода. Материал и методы. В качестве материала исследования взяты четыре анонимных повести на «парашин сюжет», относящиеся к последней четверти XIX в. В работе использованы сравнительно-сопоставительный, структурный методы, метод интертекстуального анализа. Результаты и обсуждение. Относящиеся ко второму периоду развития «парашиного сюжета» анонимные повести обнаруживают тесную взаимосвязь на уровне текста, позволяющую сделать предположение о последовательности их появления. Сюжетный код каждой из повестей демонстрирует лакуны, или «пустые места», которые задают вектор развития сюжета в каждом последующем варианте. Заключение. Анонимные повести на «парашин сюжет» представляют собой последовательный этап развития данного сюжетного кода, заключающийся в постепенной его деформации как на уровне сюжетных элементов, так и на уровне идейного содержания. Introduction. А sensational story of Parasha Lupolova, the daughter of an exile, who in 1805 walked on foot from Siberia to St. Petersburg to ask Alexander I for mercy for her convicted father, served as a basis for a number of literary works. A consistent plot (we further refer to it as “parasha’s plot”) based on this true story was formed in the first half of the XIX century. Eventually it became so popular that it was reproduced not only in the author’s, but also in anonymous works of fiction of the last quarter of the 19th century. At least two periods can be singled out in the history of the development of the “parasha’s plot”: period of formation (first half of the XIX century) and period of modification (late XIX – early XX centuries).Aim and objectives. Among the aims of the article are: to introduce into scientific circulation the discovered anonymous stories based on “parasha’s plot”; to study interconnections of these texts; to trace changes in the plot code of these anonymous stories; and finally – to establish whether the patterns of plot development are universal for all so-called secondary texts, regardless of the source of their plot. Material and methods. As material for the study, four anonymous stories on the “parasha’s plot” related to the last quarter of the 19th century were taken. The work uses comparative and structural methods, as well as the method of intertextual analysis.Results and discussion. Anonymous stories based on the “parasha’s plot” reveal a close interconnection at the textual level, which suggests a sequence in which they emerged. The plot code of each of the stories demonstrates deformations or “empty spaces” (lacunae), which define the direction for the development of the plot in each subsequent version.Conclusion. Anonymous stories which belong to the second period of “parasha’s plot” development represent its integral stage, which consists in its gradual deformation both at the level of plot elements and at the level of ideological content. At the same time, the modifications of the plot code in the anonymous stories confirm the regularities revealed in the analysis of the plot codes of the secondary texts regardless of their plot origin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it