MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285088258 · doi:10.1111/epi.17364

Electroencephalography–functional magnetic resonance imaging of epileptiform discharges: Noninvasive investigation of the whole brain

2022· review· en· W4285088258 on OpenAlexafffund
Satoru Ikemoto, Nicolás von Ellenrieder, Jean Gotman

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUehara Memorial Foundation
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEEG-fMRIIctalFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeuroscienceArtifact (error)EpilepsyMagnetoencephalographyMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingPsychologyBrain activity and meditationMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simultaneous electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) is a unique and noninvasive method for investigating epileptic activity. Interictal epileptiform discharge-related EEG-fMRI provides cortical and subcortical blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes specific to epileptic discharges. As a result, EEG-fMRI has revealed insights into generators and networks involved in epileptic activity in different types of epilepsy, demonstrating-for instance-the implication of the thalamus in human generalized spike and wave discharges and the role of the default mode network in absences and focal epilepsy, and has suggested a mechanism for the cortico-subcortical interactions in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome discharges. EEG-fMRI can find deep sources of epileptic activity not available to scalp EEG or magnetoencephalography, and provides critical new information to delineate the epileptic focus when considering surgical treatment or electrode implantation. In recent years, methodological advances, such as artifact removal and automatic detection of events, have rendered this method easier to implement, and its clinical potential has since been established by evidence of the impact of BOLD response on clinical decision-making and of the relationship between concordance of BOLD responses with extent of resection and surgical outcome. This review presents the recent developments in EEG-fMRI methodology and EEG-fMRI studies in different types of epileptic disorders as follows: EEG-fMRI acquisition, gradient and pulse artifact removal, statistical analysis, clinical applications, presurgical evaluation, altered physiological state in generalized genetic epilepsy, and pediatric EEG-fMRI studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207