MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285089358 · doi:10.3390/en15145080

Direct Model Reference Adaptive Control of a Boost Converter for Voltage Regulation in Microgrids

2022· article· en· W4285089358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)PID controllerController (irrigation)Boost converterVoltageVoltage controllerPhotovoltaic systemVoltage referenceComputer scienceInductorEngineeringVoltage regulatorControl engineeringControl (management)Voltage droopTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we present a Direct Model Reference Adaptive Control (DMRAC) algorithm in a boost converter used in islanded microgrids (MG) with a solar photovoltaic (PV) system. Islanded types of microgrids have very sensitive voltage and frequency variability; therefore, a robust and adaptive controller is always desired to control such variations within the MG. A DC–DC boost converter with a modified MIT rule controller is proposed in this paper, which stabilizes output voltage variations in islanded MG. Since the boost converter is a non-minimum phase, the controller design that relies only on output voltage feedback becomes challenging. Even though output voltage control can be achieved using inductor current control, such current mode controllers may also require prior knowledge of the load resistance and more states, such as output and inductor currents in feedback. Here, two control loops are used to achieve a stable output voltage; a PID controller can regulate the output voltage at a fixed level, and the outer loop is designed to implement the MIT rule for a DMRAC. To ensure that the actual system is following the desired reference model, using only an output voltage feedback sensor, a DMRAC is devised to update the PID controller parameters in real-time. Compared to a DC–DC boost converter connected to the MG, a controller, such as the one introduced in this paper, is more successful in dealing with unknown parameter fluctuations and disturbance changes. The MATLAB/SIMULINK is used to design and simulate the controller with different load disturbances and input voltage variances. The hardware validation is also carried out to show the performance of the proposed controller. Our results suggest that the DMRAC provides robust regulation against parameter variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it