MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285092699 · doi:10.3390/app12147022

DECIDE: A Deterministic Mixed Quantum-Classical Dynamics Approach

2022· article· en· W4285092699 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Liu, Alessandro Sergi, Gabriel Hanna

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquations of motionQuantumQuantum dynamicsBasis (linear algebra)Harmonic oscillatorComputer scienceStatistical physicsRepresentation (politics)Position (finance)Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Classical mechanicsPhysicsApplied mathematicsMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mixed quantum-classical dynamics provides an efficient way of simulating the dynamics of quantum subsystems coupled to many-body environments. Many processes, including proton-transfer reactions, electron-transfer reactions, and vibrational energy transport, for example, take place in such open systems. The most accurate algorithms for performing mixed quantum-classical simulations require very large ensembles of trajectories to obtain converged expectation values, which is computationally prohibitive for quantum subsystems containing even a few degrees of freedom. The recently developed “Deterministic evolution of coordinates with initial decoupled equations” (DECIDE) method has demonstrated high accuracy and low computational cost for a host of model systems; however, these applications relied on representing the equations of motion in subsystem and adiabatic energy bases. While these representations are convenient for certain systems, the position representation is convenient for many other systems, including systems undergoing proton- and electron-transfer reactions. Thus, in this review, we provide a step-by-step derivation of the DECIDE approach and demonstrate how to cast the DECIDE equations in a quantum harmonic oscillator position basis for a simple one-dimensional (1D) hydrogen bond model. After integrating the DECIDE equations of motion on this basis, we show that the total energy of the system is conserved for this model and calculate various quantities of interest. Limitations of casting the equations in an incomplete basis are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207