MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285096680 · doi:10.5772/intechopen.105646

Perspective Chapter: The Role of Knowledge Employees’ Voices in Creating Knowledge in Digital Startups

2022· book-chapter· en· W4285096680 on OpenAlexaff
Elahe Hosseini, Mehdi Tajpour, Muhammad Mohiuddin

Bibliographic record

VenueIntechOpen eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge managementExploitBusinessKnowledge economyCompetitive advantagePerspective (graphical)Asset (computer security)CreativityKnowledge value chainContext (archaeology)Organizational learningMarketingComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge capital is the most important asset for an organization in today’s context. Digitalization and platformalization of the economy transformed the organizational ecosystem where we need continuous improvement through innovation and creativity. To that end, knowledge employees play an important role in raising their voices with feedback and ideas. This chapter explores the role of knowledge employees in digital startups and how top management can ensure an organizational ecosystem where knowledge employees can flourish and contribute to the competitive advantage of the firms. Our analysis shows that top management needs to create both conducive organizational culture and infrastructure of the organization to fully explore and exploit the knowledge of employees’ expertise and experience for organizational advantages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntechOpen eBooksSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207