Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new neural speech compression method that is practical in the sense that it operates at low bitrate, introduces a low latency, is compatible in computational complexity with current mobile devices, and provides a subjective quality that is comparable to that of standard mobile-telephony codecs. Other recently proposed neural vocoders also have the ability to operate at low bitrate. However, they do not produce the same level of subjective quality as standard codecs. On the other hand, standard codecs rely on objective and short-term metrics such as the segmental signal-to-noise ratio that correlate only weakly with perception. Furthermore, standard codecs are less efficient than unsupervised neural networks at capturing speech attributes, especially long-term ones. The proposed method combines a cognitive-coding encoder that extracts an interpretable unsupervised hierarchical representation with a multi stage decoder that has a GAN-based architecture. We observe that this method is very robust to the quantization of representation features. An AB test was conducted on a subset of the Harvard sentences that are commonly used to evaluate standard mobile-telephony codecs. The results show that the proposed method outperforms the standard AMR-WB codec in terms of delay, bitrate and subjective quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".