The Outcome of Endodontic Regeneration in a Delayed Replanted Immature Permanent Incisor: A TurboReg Analysis of a Case
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this case report is to address a delayed replantation and successful regenerative endodontic procedure of an avulsed immature permanent incisor which was confirmed by TurboReg analysis. STUDY DESIGN: In this case, regenerative endodontic procedure was performed on an avulsed tooth with a delayed replantation in a 7 year old boy. In the emergency visit after the avulsion accident in February 2017, the tooth was replanted and one week later regenerative endodontic procedure began. After 17 months follow up, in July 2018, root wall thickness and length increase was confirmed by TurboReg analysis. CONCLUSION: The outcome of this treatment was evaluated by TurboReg analysis which was a remarkable increase in root length and dentinal wall thickness, despite of the delayed replantation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This case report helps to add to the literature for treatment plan in avulsion traumatic injuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".