MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust Autoencoder-based State Estimation in Power Systems

2022· article· en· W4285103619 on OpenAlexafffund
Marine Picot, Francisco Messina, Fabrice Labeau, Pablo Piantanida

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutoencoderComputer scienceEstimatorReliability (semiconductor)State (computer science)ExploitProcess (computing)Smart gridMeasure (data warehouse)Data miningArtificial intelligenceUnits of measurementTask (project management)Construct (python library)Cyber-physical systemPower (physics)AlgorithmDeep learningComputer securityStatisticsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart Grids are critical cyber-physical systems where monitoring is crucial, especially the process of state estimation. Since this task strongly depends on the reliability of power grid meters and their communication channels, it is vulnerable to cyber-attacks and, particularly, false data injection attacks (FDIAs), which are modifications on the meter readings that are often hard to detect. In this paper, we propose a method to construct a robust state estimator based on a variational autoencoder trained on the Fisher-Rao distance, which is a measure of dissimilarity between probability distributions. Then, we introduce a novel method to generate FDIAs that exploits knowledge of the state estimator and its learning procedure, for which we show effectiveness. Finally, numerical results and comparison with state-of-the-art methods confirm that our approach can archive similar estimation errors for clean and noisy (attacked) measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207