MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4285110495 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09593-1_4

IoT Architecture with Plug and Play for Fast Deployment and System Reliability: AMI Platform

2022· book-chapter· en· W4285110495 on OpenAlexaff
Bessam Abdulrazak, Suvrojoti Paul, Souhail Maraoui, Amin Rezaei, Tianqi Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware deploymentInternet of ThingsDashboardArchitectureVisualizationReliability (semiconductor)Plug and playEmbedded systemOperating systemSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The rapid advancement of the Internet of Things (IoT) has reshaped the industrial system, agricultural system, healthcare systems, and even our daily livelihoods, as the number of IoT applications is surging in these fields. Still, numerous challenges are imposed when putting in place such technology at large scale. In a system of millions of connected devices, operating each one of them manually is impossible, making IoT platforms unmaintainable. In this study, we present our attempt to achieve the autonomy of IoT infrastructure by building a platform that targets a dynamic and quick Plug and Play (PnP) deployment of the system at any given location, using predefined pipelines. The platform also supports real-time data processing, which enables the users to have reliable and real-time data visualization in a dynamic dashboard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer science→Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing→French-language works237,207→