$\bm {P}^{\bm {3}}$: Privacy-Preserving Prediction of Real-Time Energy Demands in EV Charging Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real-time and accurate prediction of charging pile energy demands in electric vehicle (EV) charging networks contributes significantly to load shedding and energy conservation. However, existing methods usually suffer from either data privacy leakage problems or heavy communication overheads. In this article, we propose a novel blockchain-based personalized federated deep learning scheme, coined $P^{3}$ , for privacy-preserving energy demands prediction in EV charging networks. Specifically, we first design an accurate deep learning-based energy demands prediction model for charging piles, by making use of the CNN, BiLSTM, and attention mechanism. Second, we develop a blockchain-based hierarchical and personalized federated learning framework with a consensus committee, allowing charging piles to collectively establish a comprehensive energy demands prediction model in a low-latency and privacy-preserving way. Last, a CKKS cryptosystem based secure communication protocol is crafted to guarantee the confidentiality of model parameters while model training. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate the superiorities of the proposed $P^{3}$ scheme in accurately predicting real-time energy demands over state-of-the-art schemes. Further, the $P^{3}$ scheme can achieve reasonably low computational costs, compared with other homomorphic-based schemes, such as Paillier and BFV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".