Attack-Resilient Optimal PMU Placement via Reinforcement Learning Guided Tree Search in Smart Grids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The operation of smart grids heavily relies on secure and accurate meter measurements provided by phasor measurement units (PMUs). Therefore, the optimal PMU placement (OPP) aiming to achieve the complete system observability of smart grids with as few PMUs as possible has been extensively investigated. Although many existing studies have focused on the OPP, few of them are concerned with the placement order of PMUs. To protect as many buses as possible in smart grids when installing PMUs in stages owing to high cost, this paper proposes the attack-resilient OPP strategy which places PMUs in order by using reinforcement learning guided tree search, where the sequential decision making of reinforcement learning is utilized to explore placement orders. The least-effort attack model is carried out to screen vulnerable buses such that the buses adjacent to these buses can be placed PMUs in advance to reduce the state space and action space of the large-scale smart grid environment. Based on that, the reinforcement learning guided tree search approach is used to explore the key buses which need placing PMUs, where the repeated exploration of the agent is avoided by tree search. Then, a reasonable placement order of PMUs is obtained according to the action sequence the proposed method provides. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified on various IEEE standard test systems and the comparison results with existing methods are provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".