MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285117390 · doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.220405.118

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Industrial Transformation and Upgrading

2022· article· en· W4285117390 on OpenAlexaff
Chenfan Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsEagle Ridge Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformation (genetics)Digital transformationEmpirical researchComputer scienceBusinessMathematicsWorld Wide WebStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper compares the theoretical connotations and mechanisms related to the study of the impact of digital inclusive finance on industrial transformation and upgrading in China, and empirically investigates the relationship between digital inclusive finance and industrial upgrading by combining data at the prefecture-level city level in China. The findings show that digital inclusive finance can effectively promote industrial transformation and upgrading, and finally put forward relevant suggestions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management ResearchSame topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceFrench-language works237,207