MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285119621 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2022.3175936

A Control Strategy for Wireless EV Charging System to Improve Weak Coupling Output Based on Variable Inductor and Capacitor

2022· article· en· W4285119621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Education, Libya
KeywordsCoupling coefficient of resonatorsInductorCapacitorTopology (electrical circuits)Coupling (piping)Wireless power transferPower (physics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringPhysicsWirelessEngineeringTelecommunicationsControl (management)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The double-sided inductor capacitor capacitor topology has been proposed in some national standards for wireless charging systems. However, misalignment between the transmitting and receiving coils usually leads to detuning and weak coupling, resulting in low output power and inefficiency. To improve power output under weak coupling, this article proposes a control method based on the variable inductor and capacitor (VLC). First, it is deduced that the zero phase angle input and full output power can be achieved by VLC regulation under certain misalignment. Second, the variable inductor using an EE-shaped core and pulsewidth modulation controlled capacitor are applied to achieve VLC regulation, and the principles and implementation of VLC are analyzed. Third, as the coupling coefficient <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">k</i> can be identified through the primary electrical parameters, a convenient and accurate coupling coefficient identification method is utilized to help VLC regulation. Finally, a prototype with a 3.3 kW output power and an 87.5% maximum system efficiency (dc–dc) is built to validate the proposed method. The experimental results are consistent with the theoretical analysis, proving that the output power is almost constant when <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">k</i> varies from 0.08 to 0.18.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it