MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285125061 · doi:10.7202/1089311ar

Table ronde multidisciplinaire : regards croisés sur les approches critiques transnationales en travail social

2022· article· fr· W4285125061 on OpenAlexaff
Myriam Richard, Roxane Caron, Ahmed Hamila, Natalie Kouri-Towe, Josiane Le Gall, Gada Mahrouse, Claudio Bolzman, Edward Ou Jin Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueIntervention · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Work Education and Practice
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)HumanitiesSociologyPolitical scienceMedicineArtNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table ronde multidisciplinaire : regards croisés sur les approches critiques transnationales en travail social. Un article de la revue Intervention (Le travail social transnational, décolonial et antiraciste : des pistes pour un renouvellement des pratiques d’intervention, de recherche et d’enseignement) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.035
Scholarly communication0.0170.021
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0120.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventionSame topicSocial Work Education and PracticeFrench-language works237,207