MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285131565 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2022.3182016

Joint Subcarrier Allocation, Modulation Mode Selection, and Trajectory Design in a UAV-Based OFDMA Network

2022· article· en· W4285131565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSubcarrierComputer scienceOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMathematical optimizationFrequency-division multiple accessTransmission (telecommunications)Reliability (semiconductor)Selection (genetic algorithm)Joint (building)Optimization problemReal-time computingComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deployment of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in scenarios with limited or no infrastructure can provide services for mobile devices flexibly. This letter investigates the UAV transmission energy minimization problem with high data rate and reliability requirements in a UAV-based Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) network. Considering that the formulated problem is a non-convex problem, we decompose the original problem into two subproblems: (i) joint subcarrier allocation and modulation mode selection subproblem, and (ii) UAV trajectory design subproblem. By solving these two subproblems, we propose the joint subcarrier allocation, modulation mode selection, and trajectory design (JSMT) algorithm. Simulation results show that the proposed JSMT algorithm can efficiently reduce the transmission energy of the UAV while meeting high data rate and reliability requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it