MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285133072 · doi:10.1109/tec.2022.3177131

Direct Interfacing of Parametric Average-Value Models of AC–DC Converters for Nodal Analysis-Based Solution

2022· article· en· W4285133072 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyyedmilad Ebrahimi, Hamid Atighechi, Sina Chiniforoosh, Juri Jatskevich

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterfacingEmtpConvertersComputer scienceParametric statisticsControl theory (sociology)Nodal analysisTransient (computer programming)Electric power systemPower (physics)Electronic engineeringVoltageMathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsComputer hardwareControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AC–DC converters are widely used in many power-electronic-based systems. There is an increasing need to simulate such systems using larger time-steps in offline and/or real-time electromagnetic transient (EMT or EMTP) simulators. The so-called parametric average-value models (PAVMs) have been developed to allow larger time-steps and provide fast simulations. However, the application of PAVMs in nodal-analysis-based EMTP programs typically requires a one-time-step delay between the interfacing sources and the network solution (i.e., indirect interfacing), causing inaccuracy and numerical instability at medium-to-large time-steps. This paper presents a direct interfacing method for PAVMs of line-commutated rectifiers (LCRs). The proposed method linearizes the PAVM interfacing equations and incorporates the respective sub-matrices and history terms into the network nodal equations, which eliminates the need for a time-step delay. Simulation studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed method in EMTP-type solution wherein very good accuracy and numerical stability is achieved at fairly large time-steps, which has not been previously possible with conventional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207