Adaptive Optics for Orbital Angular Momentum-Based Internet of Underwater Things Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orbital angular momentum (OAM) has the potential to dramatically enhance the amount of information in the Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) system. Nevertheless, underwater-turbulence-induced scintillation will destroy the orthogonality of OAM modes, hence degrading the performance of the system. In this article, a random-amplitude-mask-based adaptive optics (AOs) technique is proposed for the sake of mitigating the turbulence effects in the OAM-based underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) system. Combined with phase retrieval algorithms, the magnitudes of linear measurements obtained from the distorted OAM beams modulated with a series of random amplitude masks and focused by a lens are employed for the phase estimation. Furthermore, we present a comprehensive performance comparison against state-of-the-art phaseless wave-front sensing techniques. Moreover, the mixture exponential-generalized gamma (EGG) distribution is applied for characterizing the probability density function (PDF) of reference-channel irradiance of OAM beams coupled into a single-mode fiber (SMF). In the end, the performance metrics, such as the outage probability, the average bit-error-rate (BER), and the ergodic capacity are analyzed with the aid of PDF for both single-input-single-output (SISO) and multiinput-multioutput (MIMO) systems. In a nutshell, this article provides new insights for the applications of AO in the OAM-based UWOC system, which can serve as a candidate for supporting IoUT devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".