MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285135328 · doi:10.1109/tim.2022.3174297

Finite-Time Compensation Control for State-Variable-Unmeasurable Nonlinear Systems With Sensor and Actuator Faults

2022· article· en· W4285135328 on OpenAlexaff
Libin Wang, Huanqing Wang, Peter Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ActuatorNonlinear systemObserver (physics)Fault detection and isolationResidualEngineeringCompensation (psychology)Fault toleranceState variableControl engineeringState observerTracking errorController (irrigation)Fault (geology)Robustness (evolution)Computer scienceControl (management)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new finite-time tracking control approach is developed for nonlinear systems that have actuator and sensor faults and system state variables are not measurable. A fault compensation coefficient is used to alleviate the problem caused by the partial loss of the effectiveness of sensor. A novel fault-tolerant controller based on a state observer is proposed. Being different from conventional schemes, the constructed observer includes an adaptive fault-tolerant compensation mechanism. The presented control method is able to compensate for actuator and sensor faults at the same time, and the tracking error converges to a small residual set within finite time. The results of a numerical simulation and a practical example demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207