MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285152215 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2022.3187659

Ultra-Low Power SAR ADC Using Statistical Characteristics of Low-Activity Signals

2022· article· en· W4285152215 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamed Nasiri, Cheng Li, Lihong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNewfoundland and LabradorNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsSuccessive approximation ADCComparatorComputer scienceHistogramEnergy (signal processing)Analog-to-digital converterAnalog signalElectronic engineeringDigital-to-analog converterArtificial intelligenceDigital signal processingEngineeringMathematicsComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-activity signals, such as voice, electrocardiogram (ECG), and ultrasonic signals, in the Internet-of-Things applications have both posed unique challenges and offered special opportunities for modern analog-to-digital conversion. This article presents a new successive approximation register (SAR) analog-to-digital converter (ADC) search methodology, which is aimed at low-activity signals for reducing comparator activity and switching energy of digital-to-analog converter (DAC). By using statistical histogram information of the low-activity signals, two search solutions are proposed. The first solution is designed for some part of signal that has small difference between two adjacent samples, while the second solution is designed for that with large difference. To engage one suitable solution, the digital interval between two adjacent samples needs to be detected. In addition, a new DAC tactic is proposed to reduce the activity of DAC switches. Our simulated 10-bit SAR ADC for voice signals shows that by using our proposed method, the comparator activity is reduced by 62.09%, and the DAC switching energy is decreased by 85.90% compared to the monotonic method. In addition, the activity of DAC switches is further trimmed by 39.66% compared to the monotonic method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207