Posterior Vault Distraction for Multi-Suture Craniosynostosis in a Patient with Craniometaphyseal Dysplasia: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study Design Case report Objective Syndromic multi-suture craniosynostosis can result in complex dysmorphology and increased intracranial pressure. We present a case report of a child with craniometaphyseal dysplasia and syndromic multi-suture craniosynostosis who presented with increased intracranial pressure, ventriculomegaly and Chiari deformity Type 1. Methods The child underwent a posterior vault distraction to increase the intracranial volume. Results The posterior cranial expansion was successful in correcting the craniocerebral disproportion caused by multi-suture synostosis, and resolved the high intracranial pressure and papilloedema. There were no post-operative complications. Conclusions Posterior cranial vault distraction was an effective method of addressing increased intracranial pressure by correcting craniocerebral disproportion by increasing intracranial volume and also addressing the Chiari Type I deformity that resulted from syndromic multi-suture craniosynostosis in a child with craniometaphyseal dysplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".