MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285153627 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2022.3172524

Adaptive Naive Bayes Classifier Based Filter Using Kernel Density Estimation for Pipeline Leakage Detection

2022· article· en· W4285153627 on OpenAlexafffund
Iman Amini, Yindi Jing, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNaive Bayes classifierKernel density estimationComputer sciencePipeline transportLeakage (economics)Kernel (algebra)Bayes classifierArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsStatisticsEngineeringSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipelines are among the principal means of transporting hydrocarbon fluids and gases, so leakage detection is critical to avoid the loss of these energy resources. In this article, based on studies in field data, we model pipeline leakage as an increase in the mean value of the flow rate difference between the inlet and the outlet sensors, where the increased value is unknown and subject to change. Then, an adaptive filter is proposed based on the naive Bayes classification and the estimated cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the data in steady-state conditions using kernel density estimation. The proposed filter has a better performance in small leaks in comparison with different benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems TechnologySame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207