MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285156347 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.202210838

Neural Estimation of Seismic Local Slopes

2022· article· en· W4285156347 on OpenAlexaff
Breno Bahia, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

Venue83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlane waveSeismic waveDiscretizationPlane (geometry)Artificial neural networkFinite difference methodFinite differenceGeologyMathematical analysisGeometryMathematicsComputer scienceSeismologyPhysicsOpticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The plane-wave assumption plays a crucial role in several classic seismic data processing techniques, such as plane-wave destructors. Plane waves can be described by the local plane-wave partial differential equation, where a seismic wavefield is characterized by its slope. Plane-wave destructors are constructed as finite-difference stencils for the plane-wave differential equation as a function of the unknown seismic slope, which can be estimated through a linear least-squares problem. This paper parametrizes the slope field of a seismic section by a neural network followed by the finite difference discretization of the model to obtain a physically meaningful learning process. The neural network, although task-specific, can estimate the unknown slope of the input seismic section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue83rd EAGE Annual Conference & ExhibitionSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207