MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285157842 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2022.3177137

Electromagnetic Modeling of Transformers in EMT-Type Software by a Circuit-Based Method

2022· article· en· W4285157842 on OpenAlexaff
Sadegh Rahimi Pordanjani, Mohammed Naïdjate, Nicolas Bracikowski, Mircea Fratila, Jean Mahseredjian, Afshin Rezaei‐Zare

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerFinite element methodSoftwareElectronic engineeringCurrent transformerMagnetic coreMagnetic circuitComputer scienceMagnetic fluxEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectromagnetic coilVoltageMagnetic fieldPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work proposes a fully circuit-based method for modelling electrical transformers. This method not only offers the advantages of circuit-based methods and can be implemented in electromagnetic transient (EMT) type software, but it can also provide a detailed representation of transformers, comparable to the finite element method (FEM). The proposed method enables a detailed geometrical modelling, as well as representation of magnetic flux paths and consideration of iron core saturation. It can be implemented in EMT-type software to see the effect of power networks on transformers. In addition, the proposed method can represent internal faults in transformers. The problem is constrained to a 2-D domain, which is often used in FEMs to represent the magnetic behavior of power equipment. Finite element analysis based on ANSYS Maxwell is used to verify the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207