Doživljanje epidemije COVID-19 med študenti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to obtain data on the experience of the Covid-19 epidemic, related measures and changed living conditions of full time post-secondary Slovenian students. Data collection was conducted through a self-reported empirical web based survey as a part of a large cross-sectional study. Questionnaire was divided into 13 thematic sections. The survey took place between February 9 and March 8, 2021. A random sample consisted of 4,455 individuals. From the beginning of pandemic, the life has strongly changed 76% of survey participants, 56 % reported a change of daily rutine. In comparison to the time before the pandemic, they sleep more often, watch TV, use internet and social media, 17,6% reported decrease of financial safety. Only a quarter of survey participants reported that online study was successful. 23,3% reported fear of Covid-19, 4.7% acute clinical insomnia, severe depressive symptoms were present in 30,7 % of the respondents. severe anxiety symptoms in 16 % and 5% reported to have them almost every day suicidal thoughts The proportion of respondents who frequently sought psychological help increased during the epidemic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".