A State-of-the-Art Survey on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) and nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) have been recognized as key enabling techniques for the envisioned sixth generation (6G) of mobile communication networks. The key feature of RISs is to intelligently reconfigure the wireless propagation environment, which was once considered to be fixed and untunable. The key idea of NOMA is to utilize users’ dynamic channel conditions to improve spectral efficiency and user fairness. Naturally, the two communication techniques are complementary to each other and can be integrated to cope with the challenging requirements envisioned for 6G mobile networks. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the recent progress on the synergistic integration of RISs and NOMA. In particular, the basics of both techniques are introduced first, and then, the fundamentals of RIS-NOMA are discussed for two communication scenarios with different transceiver capabilities. Resource allocation is of paramount importance for the success of RIS-assisted NOMA networks, and various approaches, including artificial intelligence (AI)-empowered designs, are introduced. Security provisioning in RIS-NOMA networks is also discussed as wireless networks are prone to security attacks due to the nature of the shared wireless medium. Finally, the survey is concluded with detailed discussions of the challenges arising in the practical implementation of RIS-NOMA, future research directions, and emerging applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it