MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285170208 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2022.3176851

Learning-Based User Clustering in NOMA-Aided MIMO Networks With Spatially Correlated Channels

2022· article· en· W4285170208 on OpenAlexafffund
Sharareh Kiani, Min Dong, Shahram Shahbazpanahi, Gary Boudreau, Majid Bavand

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Ontario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCluster analysisMIMOSpatial multiplexingComputer scienceTransmitter power outputBeamformingTelecommunications linkMulti-user MIMOInterference (communication)Noma3G MIMOChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmComputer networkTransmitterTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the integration of non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) into massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems for downlink transmission. We consider the joint design of user clustering, transmit beamforming, and power allocation to minimize the total transmit power while meeting the signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio targets. We decompose this challenging mixed-integer programming problem into three separate subproblems to solve. We propose a low-complexity learning-based user clustering algorithm, which is a modified version of mean shift clustering with a new channel correlation based clustering metric. The proposed clustering algorithm determines the clusters to trade-off between spatial dimension and power dimension offered by respective MIMO and NOMA for user multiplexing. We then design zero-forcing transmit beamformers to eliminate inter-cluster interference and optimize power allocation to minimize the total transmit power. We provide two case studies for both co-located and distributed massive MIMO systems in spatially highly correlated prorogation environments. Simulation results show that our proposed algorithm forms NOMA clusters based on the available degrees of freedom in the system to effectively use both spatial and power dimensions, which results in a substantial performance improvement over MIMO-only methods or other existing clustering methods in such environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207