MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285170504 · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2022.3167901

Cost-Effective Task Offloading in NOMA-Enabled Vehicular Mobile Edge Computing

2022· article· en· W4285170504 on OpenAlexaff
Jianbo Du, Yan Sun, Zehui Xiong, Aijing Sun, Zhiguo Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Systems Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shaanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile edge computingServerEdge computingCloud computingDistributed computingHeuristicOptimization problemResource allocationWireless networkLyapunov optimizationResource management (computing)WirelessEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMathematical optimizationComputer networkAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and mobile edge computing (MEC) are two key emerging technologies for vehicular networks, where NOMA allows multiple vehicular user equipments (VUEs) to share the same wireless resources, and thus to enhance the spectrum utilization and system capacity, and MEC permits VUEs to offload their complex applications to MEC servers, and thus to provide support for computationally intensive intelligent applications. In this article, a NOMA-based vehicle edge computing (VEC) network model is proposed, and the cost minimization problem is constructed. Under the premise of ensuring the delay tolerance of all VUEs, the total system cost is minimized through the joint optimization of offloading decision-making, VUE clustering, subchannel and computation resource allocation, and transmission power control. Since the proposed problem is a mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem, which is difficult to solve, we decouple it into two subproblems and propose two heuristic algorithms to solve the task offloading and the MEC resource assignment problem, respectively, and finally, we obtain the closed-form solutions for cloud-related optimization problems through simple analysis. Simulation results show that the proposed joint algorithm is superior to other baseline algorithms in terms of system cost minimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Systems JournalSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207