STATE REGULATION OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY: WORLD EXPERIENCE AGAINST CORRUPTION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the features of anti-corruption in foreign countries. In particular, the concept of corruption in international acts is defined, as well as the peculiarities of the legal regulation of anticorruption in Germany, Israel and Esto-nia. It is recommended to use the experience of these countries to combat corruption in Ukraine. It is noted that in general, the mechanisms for combating corruption in foreign countries are not fundamentally different. The main difference is in the ap-proaches and motivation of their application. Therefore, in order to successfully overcome corruption, it is necessary to have not only perfect legislation, but high-quality work of anti-corruption bodies. It has been shown that an analysis of inter-national legal instruments defining corruption suggests that corruption at the inter-national level is interpreted as an abuse of power or a notion of trust for the sake of personal privileges or in favor of privileges of another person or group to whom loyalty is observed. The analysis concluded that the countries that have created an effective anti-corruption mechanism include: Germany, Finland, Denmark, New Zealand, Iceland, Singapore, Sweden, Canada, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Norway, Australia, Switzerland, Great Britain , Austria, Israel, USA, Chile, Ireland and others
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it