MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285186354 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2022.3174250

Resilient Model Predictive Adaptive Control of Networked Z-Source Inverters Using GMDH

2022· article· en· W4285186354 on OpenAlexaff
Amirhossein Ahmadi, Yasin Asadi, Ali Moradi Amani, Mahdi Jalili, Xinghuo Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlController (irrigation)Smart gridElectric power systemComputer scienceKalman filterNoise (video)EstimatorControl engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Control (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power grids are increasingly evolving into more efficient smart grids thanks to advancements in information technology. However, these intelligent communication-dependant power systems are becoming more susceptible to cyberattacks than their traditional peers. Power inverters are one of the main network connected devices supporting grid stability, which can potentially be targets for cyber-threats. This article presents an attack-resilient model predictive adaptive controller for a class of inverters, called Z-source inverters, to protect them against deception attacks. The proposed control structure includes a model predictive controller equipped with an unknown input Kalman filter and an estimator for system perturbations. The group method of data handling technique is used to estimate system uncertainties and make the system robust against perturbations. The unknown input Kalman filter is also adopted to estimate the states and unknown inputs in the presence of noisy measurements and cyberattacks on the control signal. We mathematically prove that in the presence of noise and perturbations, the proposed controller guarantees the stability of the system under a deception attack, which causes a delay, less than a sampling time, in control signals. Simulation results reveal the effectiveness of the presented controller in protecting the system against pulse, scaling and random attacks in the presence of system uncertainties, source and load fluctuations and output noises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207